Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Sloane v. Gulf Interstate Field Services, Inc

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

June 7, 2017

THOMAS SLOANE, Plaintiff,
v.
GULF INTERSTATE FIELD SERVICES, INC., Defendant.

          ORDER

          Matthew W. Brann United States District Judge

         FINDINGS:

Hughes v. Gulf Interstate Field Services, Inc.

         2. On August 8, 2016, the Honorable Edmund A. Sargus, Jr., to whom the Hughes matter was assigned, entered summary judgment in favor of the Defendant.

         4. This Court entered a Memorandum and Order denying class and collective certification on March 24, 2017. ECF Nos. 192-93.

Hughes

         6. “A stay is an extraordinary measure. The party seeking a stay must offer compelling reasons to abridge the opposing party's right to litigate.” Pennsylvania ex rel. Kane v. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., No. 1:13-CV-605, 2013 WL 1397434, at *2 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 5, 2013) (Conner, J.) (citing CTF Hotel Holdings, Inc. v. Marriot Intern., Inc., 381 F.3d 131, 139 (3d Cir. 2004)).

Cost Bros. v. Travelers Indem. Co.
760 F.2d 58

         8. In determining whether to grant a stay, this Court typically considers four factors: “(1) the length of the requested stay; (2) the hardship that the moving party would face in going forward with the litigation; (3) the injury that a stay would cause the non-moving party; (4) and whether a stay will simplify issues and promote judicial economy.” Scicchitano v. County of Northumberland, 2015 WL 7568357, at *2 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 25, 2015) (Brann, J.). See also Toshiba Samsung Storage Tech. Korea Corp. v. LG Elecs., Inc., 193 F.Supp.3d 345, 348 (D. Del. 2016) (“This Court has typically considered three factors when deciding a motion to stay: (1) whether granting the stay will simplify the issues for trial; (2) the status of the litigation, particularly whether discovery is complete and a trial date has been set; and (3) whether a stay would cause the non-movant to suffer undue prejudice from any delay, or allow the movant to gain a clear tactical advantage.”).

Hughes See, e.g. Hughes

         10. Further, this Court made two substantive citations to Hughes in its 67-page ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.