United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Mehalchick, Magistrate Judge
Kane, District Judge
BACKGROUND OF THIS ORDER IS AS FOLLOWS:
November 18, 2016, Magistrate Judge Mehalchick issued a
Report and Recommendation in the above-captioned case
recommending that Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary
injunction (Doc. No. 3), be denied. (Doc. No. 8.) Objections
to that Report and Recommendation were due by December 5,
2016. On December 5, 2016, Plaintiff filed a one-page
document entitled “Motion to Extend Time to Answer
Denial of Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction
to Amend Plaintiff's Complaint; and a Motion for
Permission to File on Behalf of Six New Plaintiff's
Complaints All of Which Are to Be Related to Plaintiff's,
16-CV-00731-YK, Complaint and All of Which Seek to Be Filed
Under Seal. Or In Camera Review Prior to Being Docketed
.” (Doc. No. 9.) The Court construed the document as a
motion for additional time to file objections to Magistrate
Judge Mehalchick's Report and Recommendation, and granted
the motion insofar as it sought additional time to file
objections. (Doc. No. 10.) Pursuant to the Court's Order,
objections to the Report and Recommendation were due December
December 16, 2016, Plaintiff filed a “Motion for
Additional Time to Reply to Magistrate Report and
Recommendation.” (Doc. No. 11.) The Court again granted
Plaintiff additional time to file objections to Magistrate
Judge Mehalchick's Report and Recommendation, setting the
date of January 6, 2017 as the deadline for filing any
objections to the Report and Recommendation. (Doc. No. 13.)
In that Order, however, the Court cautioned Plaintiff that it
would not entertain any further motions for extension of time
to file objections to the Report and Recommendation. No
timely objections have been filed.
this 10th day of January 2017, upon consideration of the
record and applicable law, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No.
8) of Magistrate Judge Mehalchick.
2. Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction (Doc.
No. 3) is DENIED.
3. This matter is referred back to Magistrate Judge
Mehalchick for further ...