United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
STEWART DALZELL, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 22nd day of July, 2015, upon consideration of defendants Loretta Lynch and Thomas E. Brandon's (collectively, "the Government") motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, motion for summary judgment (docket entry # 10) and plaintiff Watson's response thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Defendants' motion for leave to file a reply is GRANTED;
2. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a surreply is GRANTED;
3. Defendants' motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART;
4. Defendants' motion to dismiss Watson's Second Amendment and Commerce Clause claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is DENIED;
5. Defendants' motion to dismiss Watson's complaint pursuant to 12(b)(6) is GRANTED; and
6. By noon on August 10, 2015, the parties shall FILE any motions, not to exceed ten pages, in the forfeiture action concerning the disposition of the Palmetto ...