Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In re Imprelis Herbicide Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

June 18, 2015

IN RE IMPRELIS HERBICIDE MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT APPLIES TO: ALL ACTIONS No. 11-md-02284

ORDER

GENE E.K. PRATTER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

AND NOW, this 18th day of June, 2015, upon consideration of DuPont’s Motion for Permanent Injunction Barring the Holmeses’ Imprelis Action (Docket No. 381), the Holmeses’ Opposition (Docket No. 432) and DuPont’s Reply (Docket No. 441), it is hereby ORDERED that: DuPont’s Motion (Docket No. 381) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs John R. Holmes and Mary Ann Holmes, individually and as trustees of the John R. Holmes Living Trust, as well as any attorney acting on their behalf, are ENJOINED from prosecuting their Indiana state court action against DuPont and defendants List Lawn Care and Arbor Care Tree & Landscaping, related to Imprelis® injuries to property, Holmes v. List Lawn Care, Inc., et al., Case No. 34D02-1502-PL-00153 (Howard County Circuit Court, Indiana), provided, however, that these enjoined persons may take such steps to effect the dismissal of the state court action with prejudice.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.