United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
June 10, 2015
EDWARD C. PETERSON, Petitioner,
WARDEN EDWARD BRENNAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADEPHIA, and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondents.
JAN E. DuBOIS, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 9th day of June, 2015, upon consideration of "Motion to Reopen Judgment Under F.R.C.P. 60(b)(6)" filed by pro se petitioner, Edward C. Peterson (Document No. 124, filed December 3, 2014), for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum dated June 9, 2015, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. "Motion to Reopen Judgment Under F.R.C.P. 60(b)(6)" filed by pro se petitioner, Edward C. Peterson, is DISMISSED AS UNTIMELY FILED; and,
2. A certificate of appealability will not issue because reasonable jurists would not debate the propriety of this Court's procedural ruling. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).