Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Nicholas v. Patrick

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

May 13, 2015

LARRY D. NICHOLAS, Petitioner,
v.
MR. GEORGE PATRICK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondents.

ORDER

JAN E. DuBOIS, District Judge.

AND NOW, this 11th day of May, 2015, upon consideration of pro se petitioner Larry D. Nicholas' Hazel-Atlas Motion (Document No. 41, filed September 17, 2014); the Government's Response to the Hazel-Atlas Motion (Document No. 45, filed November 25, 2014); pro se petitioner's Supplemental Hazel-Atlas Motion (Document No. 46, filed December 15, 2014); the Government's Supplemental Response to the Hazel-Atlas Motions (Document No. 52, filed February 27, 2015); pro se petitioner's Reply in Further Support of the Hazel-Atlas Motions (Document No. 53, filed March 11, 2015); and pro se petitioner's Supplemental Reply in Further Support of the Hazel-Atlas Motions (Document No. 54, filed March 25, 2015), IT IS ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum dated May 11, 2015, pro se petitioner's Hazel-Atlas Motion (Document No. 41) and Supplemental Hazel-Atlas Motion (Document No. 46) are DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability WILL NOT ISSUE on the ground that reasonable jurists would not debate this Court's procedural rulings with respect to pro se petitioner's claims or whether he has stated a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Morris v. Horn, 187 F.3d 333, 340 (3d Cir. 1999); 28 U.S.C. ยง 2253(c).


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.