Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Wright v. Lamas

United States District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania

April 22, 2015

JAMAL WRIGHT
v.
MARIROSA LAMAS, et al.

ORDER

Stewart Dalzell, J.

AND NOW, this 22nd day of April, 2015, upon consideration of petitioner Jamal Wright’s pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus (docket entry #1), our Order referring this matter to the Hon. Richard A. Lloret for a report and recommendation (docket entry #9), and that report and recommendation (docket entry #26), to which petitioner did not object within the period specified by Loc. R. Civ. P. 72.1 IV (b), and the Court agreeing with Judge Lloret that the petition was untimely filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d), there is no basis to equitably toll the statute of limitations, and jurists of reason would not debate the correctness of this procedural ruling, see Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000), it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Judge Lloret’s report and recommendation (docket entry #5) is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. Petitioner’s pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus (docket entry #1) is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE;

3. We DECLINE to issue a certificate of appealability; and

4. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case statistically.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.