Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Avangard Financial Group, Inc. v. Raich Ende Malter & Co. LLP

United States District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania

April 17, 2015

AVANGARD FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. Plaintiff,
v.
RAICH ENDE MALTER & CO, LLP, Defendant.

ORDER

DUBOIS, JAN E., J

AND NOW, this 17th day of April, 2015 upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Document No. 40, filed February 12, 2015); Brief of Defendant, Raich Ende Malter & Co., LLP, in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Document No. 46, filed February 26, 2015); Defendant, Raich Ende Malter & Co., LLP’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff’s Claims (Document No. 41, filed February 12, 2015); Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff’s Claims (Document No. 43, filed February 26, 2015); Defendant, Raich Ende Malter & Co., LLP’s Motion to Preclude the Expert Report and Testimony of Thomas P. Kirwin (Document No. 42, filed February 12, 2015); and Plaintiff’s, Avangard Financial Group, Inc., Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Preclude the Expert Report and Testimony of Thomas P. Kirwin (Document Nos. 44 & 45, filed February 26, 2015), for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum dated April 17, 2015, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Document No. 40) is DENIED;

2. Defendant, Raich Ende Malter & Co., LLP’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff’s Claims (Document No. 41) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as follows:

a. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED with respect to plaintiff’s claims of unjust enrichment (Count III) and negligence (Count IV);
b. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED in all other respects;[1]

3. Defendant, Raich Ende Malter & Co., LLP’s Motion to Preclude the Expert Report and Testimony of Thomas P. Kirwin (Document No. 42) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as follows:

a. That part of defendant’s Motion which seeks to preclude Thomas P. Kirwin from testifying at trial that defendant “is in breach of the Audit Engagement Letter” and that defendant “was negligent in [its] responsibilities to [plaintiff]” is GRANTED; and

b. Defendant’s Motion to Preclude is DENIED in all other respects.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.