Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ford v. Johnson & Johnson

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

April 13, 2015

ROBERT FORD, Plaintiff,
v.
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, et. al., Defendants.

Schwab Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Matthew W. Brann United States District Judge

The Court has conducted a de novo review of the thorough report and recommendation of the magistrate judge. The Court finds that after reviewing the well known ‘Poulis factors, ’ dismissal is the appropriate sanction for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a court order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). See Poulis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 747 F.2d 863 (3d Cir. 1984).

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The March 11, 2015 report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab is ADOPTED. ECF No. 25.

2. The complaint is dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a court order pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

3. The clerk is directed to close the case file.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.