Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Palan v. Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

February 20, 2015

BRIAN PALAN, Plaintiff,
v.
INOVIO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.; PETER KIES; J. JOSEPH KIM; THOMAS KIM; AVTAR DHILLION; and JEFFREY RICHARDSON, Defendants.

ORDER

WENDY BEETLESTONE, District Judge.

AND NOW, this 20th day of February, 2015, upon consideration of Defendants Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Peter Kies; J. Joseph Kim; Thomas Kim; Avtar Dhillion; and Jeffrey Richardson's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim [ECF No. 9] and the Plaintiff's Response in Opposition thereto [ECF No. 11], and for the reasons discussed in the Court's Memorandum Opinion of February 20, 2015 [ECF No. 21], IT IS ORDERED that:

(1) the Motion to Dismiss the Complaint is GRANTED as to Defendants J. Joseph Kim and Avtar Dhillion; all claims against these Defendants are DISMISSED;
(2) the Motion to Dismiss Count I of the Complaint is GRANTED as to Defendants Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Peter Kies; Thomas Kim; and Jeffrey Richardson; Count I of the Complaint [ECF No. 1] is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE;
(3) the Motion to Dismiss Count II of the Complaint is DENIED as to Defendants Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Peter Kies; Thomas Kim; and Jeffrey Richardson;
(4) the Plaintiff shall be granted leave to file an amended complaint consistent with the Court's memorandum opinion; such amended complaint ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.