Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell & Hippel Llp v. West

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

February 2, 2015

OBERMAYER REBMANN MAXWELL & HIPPEL LLP, Plaintiff,
v.
JOHN H.C. WEST, III, et al., Defendants.

ORDER

CATHY BISSOON District Judge.

Plaintiff's Renewed Motion (Doc. 15) to deposit funds under seal will be granted. All Defendants have had notice of Plaintiff's request, and no opposition has been raised. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 67(a) (requiring notice to all parties before deposit will be permitted); see also Doc. 14 at ΒΆ 23 (Defendants Fast Trak and RJC also request that Plaintiff deposit funds). Furthermore, Plaintiff's Reply (Doc. 17) has convinced the Court that the deposit should be made under seal, and that the filing at Document 14 should be sealed.[1]

Consistent with the foregoing, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows: Plaintiff's Renewed Motion (Doc. 15) is GRANTED; Plaintiff is granted leave to deposit funds with the Court, in compliance with Federal Rule 67(b), and the deposit shall be made under seal; and, until further order of Court, all parties are instructed to file under seal any submissions referencing the matters discussed in Plaintiff's Motion (Doc. 15). In so doing, the parties shall comply with this Court's procedures regarding the filing of sealed documents, [2] although the redaction requirement is waived.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.