Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Cabbagestalk v. United States of America Western Dist.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

January 23, 2015

MARVIN CABBAGESTALK, Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WESTERN DIST., MR. HUDSON, WARDEN, FCI RAYBROOK; and MR. ELLIS, RECORD MANAGER, FCI RAYBROOK, Defendants.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CYNTHIA REED EDDY, Magistrate Judge.

I. RECOMMENDATION

It is recommended that this prisoner civil rights action be transferred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York.

II. REPORT

A. Background

Marvin Caggabestalk ("Cabbagesetalk") is a state inmate currently incarcerated at the State Correctional Institution at Benner Township ("SCI-Benner Township") in Bellefonte, Pennsylvania. Plaintiff has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and attached a Complaint against the "United States of America West. Dist, " the Warden at FCI Ray Brook, and the Record Manager at FCI Ray Brook. Cabbagestalk brings this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. (ECF No. 1-2).

Prior to his incarceration at SCI-Benner Township, Cabbagestalk was in federal custody at FCI Raybrook. FCI Ray Brook is located within the territorial limits of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. Cabbagestalk contends that as a result of Defendants' conduct he "served a total of Four Hundred and Forty Seven Days', in illegal status." He also contends that Warden Hudson "in retaliation" had Cabbagestalk transferred back to "state custody" under a fraudulent warrant from the Pennsylvania State Parole Board.

B. Venue

In cases, such as this one, in which subject matter jurisdiction is not founded solely on the parties' diversity of citizenship, the federal venue statute holds venue proper only in the following districts:

(1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all defendants reside in the same State, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is situated, or (3) a judicial district in which any defendant may be found, if there is no district in which the action may otherwise be brought.

28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). The Court finds that venue is improper in this district. First, the complaint reflects that the defendants are not located in this district. Thus, the first requirement has not been met. Venue is also improper under the second requirement since a "substantial part" of the events giving rise to Cabbagestalk's claims did not occur in the Western District of Pennsylvania. In fact, all of the complained of conduct giving rise to Cabbagestalk's claims occurred at FCI Ray Brook, which is located within the territorial limits of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. Venue is also inappropriate under the third requirement because this case can proceed in the Northern District of New York. Thus, there exists a "district in which the action may otherwise be brought."

In sum, this district is an improper venue under § 1391(b) for the claims brought in this lawsuit.

C. Transfer Under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a)

Having determined that venue in this case is improper in this district, the Court must decide whether to dismiss the case or transfer the case to a district where venue is properly laid, ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.