Buy This Entire Record For
Harris v. Vitran Express, Inc.
United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
November 6, 2014
DARRELL HARRIS, Plaintiff,
VITRAN EXPRESS, INC., VITRAN EXPRESS CANADA, INC., VITRAN CORPORATION, INC., DATA PROCESSING, LLC, HR-1 CORPORATION and CT TRANSPORT, INC. a/k/a CENTRAL TRANSPORT, INC., Defendants.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
ARTHUR J. SCHWAB, Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 29) recommending that the Motion to Dismiss or Stay Action filed by Plaintiff (doc. no. 12) be denied. Objections to the Report and Recommendation were due by November 3, 2014. No objections were filed. The matter is ripe for disposition.
The district court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the report to which objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); see also Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 877 (3d Cir.1987). This Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge. The district court judge may also receive further evidence or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions
AND NOW, this 6th day of November, 2014, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows:
IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 29) is ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss or Stay Action ...