United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
October 6, 2014
WILLIAM A. HIMCHAK, III, Plaintiff,
KATHLEEN KANE, Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al., Defendants
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER, Chief District Judge.
AND NOW, this 6th day of October, 2014, upon consideration of the third motion (Doc. 16) for reconsideration filed by pro se plaintiff William A. Himchak ("Himchak"), wherein Himchak seeks vacatur of the court's orders (Docs. 11, 13, 15) denying his request for injunctive relief and his motions to reconsider those rulings, and further requests recusal and disqualification of the undersigned given these adverse rulings, (Doc. 16 at 6-7), and the court reaffirming that Himchak's request for injunctive relief is of no merit and that Himchak does not state a valid basis for reconsideration of the court's initial or subsequent orders, see Max's Seafood Cafe v. Quinteros , 176 F.3d 669, 677-78 (3d Cir. 1999); Harsco Corp. v. Zlotnicki , 779 F.2d 906, 909 (3d Cir. 1985), and the court further finding that Himchak's allegations of "extreme bias" against the undersigned are conclusory, speculative, and entirely without merit,  it is hereby ORDERED that Himchak's third motion (Doc. 16) for reconsideration and for recusal and disqualification of the undersigned is DENIED.