Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Gray v. Wakefield

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

October 3, 2014

ANTHONY LEE GRAY, Plaintiff
v.
DAVID J. WAKEFIELD, et al., Defendants.

ORDER

MALACHY E. MANNION, District Judge.

In light of the memorandum this same day, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT plaintiff's motion in limine, (Doc. 194), is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff's requests to obtain DOC videotaping policies is GRANTED IN PART as noted in the memorandum. Plaintiff's unopposed request to use the declaration of Mario Berry is GRANTED. Defendants are ordered to provide plaintiff with the redacted portions of the policy documents as described in the accompanying memorandum. Plaintiff's requests for a legal assistant, to exclude evidence of his assault conviction, to be given B, C, and D-Pod videos, to call additional witness, and to be given the letter from Ms. Moore-Smeal are DENIED. His requests to speak with Mr. Sutton and to view video he already has in his possession are MOOT.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.