United States District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ROBERT C. MITCHELL UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Willie Maurice Harris and inmate at the State Correctional Institution at Graterford has presented a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Harris is presently serving a life sentence imposed following his conviction by a jury of first degree murder at No. CP-02-CR-3121-1997 in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. This sentence was imposed on September 4, 1997.
A notice of appeal to the Superior Court was filed on November 12, 1997 at Docket 2252 Pgh 1997) and the appeal was dismissed on February 24, 1999 for failure to file a timely brief but notifying the petitioner of his right to file a post-conviction petition.
On October 1, 2001, Harris filed a post-conviction petition and on March 26, 2002, his appellate rights were reinstated. A notice of appeal was filed on April 19, 2002 at 682 WDA 2002 and his conviction was affirmed on August 6, 2004. Although originally granted, allowance of appeal was subsequently denied on February 15, 2005.
On October 1, 2007, Harris filed a post-conviction petition which was denied on July 29, 2011. On June 20, 2012, the Superior Court affirmed the denial of relief and allowance of appeal was denied on March 21, 2013.
On May 28, 2013, another post-conviction petition was filed and on July 2, 2014 the court indicated its intention to dismiss the petition as untimely.
In the instant petition, executed on September 12, 2014 and received in this Court on September 23, 2014, Harris contends he is entitled to relief on the following grounds.
1. Petitioner's newly recognized claim mandatory life-without-parole terms for adults in non-homicide and homicide cases violate state and federal equal protection clauses, as well as Art.7 of the Universal Declaration of human rights.
2. Petitioner's newly recognized scientific developments establishes mandatory life- without parole terms for individuals over the age 17 but below age 21, violate the 8th amendment, art. 5 of the universal declaration of human rights, as well as art. 1 sec.13 of the Pa. Constitution.
3. The trial court's failure to consider the mitigating factors is a violation of the equal protection clause, violation of petitioner's due process right under the 5, 6 and 14th amendment as well as a violation of the United States Constitution 8thamendment's cruel and unusual punishment clause when applied and dealing with juvenile individuals between the age of 18 to 21 years of age.
4. Petitioner's mandatory sentence of life without parole violates the 8th amendment to the United States constitution and art.1, §13 of the Pa. Const. Petitioner should be individually resentenced on less-included offenses.
5. Petitioner is entitled to relief based on the Commonwealth's failure to fulfill its due process obligation to disclose favorable evidence in violation of petitioner's 6, 14th amendment right.
6. Petitioner is entitled to relief where judgment of sentence order unlawfully sentenced petitioner pursuant to statue 42 Pa.C.S. § 9715, which is not applicable to petitioner in violation of petitioner's due process rights.
7. Ineffective assistance of trial counsel, post-motion counsel, direct appeals counsel, pcra counsel and appellate counsel for failing to raise prior counsels' ineffectiveness for failing to use the compulsory process to secure and present exculpatory and material witnesses Khalilah Thompson, Olufemi Young, Susie Venson, Erica Venson, Detective McDonald in violation of petitioner's due process rights to a fair trial as well as petitioner's right to present witnesses in his defense and properly ...