Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Muniz v. Ganzler

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

September 30, 2014

ANGEL MUNIZ, Plaintiff,
v.
GANZLER, et al., Defendants

ORDER

CYNTHIA M. RUFE, District Judge.

AND NOW, this 29th day of September, 2014, upon consideration of Defendants Rowell, Ganzel and Plizak's Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 18] and Defendants Gibbs, Nash and Marano's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 19], for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The motion of Defendants Rowell, Ganzel, and Plizak is DENIED;
2. The motion of Defendants Gibbs, Nash and Marano is GRANTED and Plaintiff's claims against these defendants are DISMISSED without prejudice.
3. If Plaintiff wishes to file an amended complaint, he may do so no later than October 20, 2014;
4. If Plaintiff does not file an amended complaint, Defendants Rowell, Ganzel and Plizak must file an Answer to Plaintiff's complaint no later than November 3, 2014.

It is so ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.