United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
RICHARD A. MINFORD, Plaintiff,
BERKS COUNTY (INC.)/COUNTY OF BERKS (INC.), along with its OFFICES, Employees, agencies and instrumentalities; and VARIOUS UNKNOWN OR UN-NAMED AGENTS AND INSTRUMENTALITIES a/k/a JOHN/JANE DOE(S), Defendants.
EDWARD G. SMITH, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 29th day of September, 2014, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. The plaintiff pro se, Richard A. Minford, will SHOW CAUSE why the court should not dismiss this action for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction;
2. The plaintiff, if responding, must file a response with the court no later than Monday, October 20, 2014;
3. If the plaintiff fails to respond to this order to show cause, the court will interpret his failure as an indication that he is unopposed to dismissal of this action; and
4. The court will decide the order to show cause on Tuesday, October 21, 2014, or soon thereafter, without oral argument ...