Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Harlan v. Transworld Systems, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

September 9, 2014

DENISE HARLAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff,
v.
TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS, INC., d/b/a, NORTH SHORE AGENCY, INC. Defendant.

ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS SETTLEMENT

GENE E.K. PRATTER, District Judge.

AND NOW, this 8th day of September, 2014, upon consideration of Ms. Harlan's uncontested Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement (Docket No. 25) and Ms. Harlan's September 4, 2014 Status Report containing the parties' Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement (Docket No. 27); following a hearing on September 2, 2014; and consistent with the Memorandum accompanying this Order, the Court HEREBY ORDERS and DECREES that the Motion is GRANTED as follows:

1. Denise Harlan, on behalf of herself and a putative class, and Transworld Systems, Inc., also known as North Shore Agency, Inc. ("North Shore"), have reached a Settlement Agreement (Docket No. 25-3) regarding North Shore's alleged violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-1692p.

2. In compliance with the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005, 28 U.S.C. § 1715, North Shore shall promptly provide written notice of the proposed class settlement to the appropriate state and federal officials.

3. The Court makes no determination concerning the manageability of this action as a class action if it were to go to trial. See In re Cmty. Bank of N. Va., 418 F.3d 277, 306 (3d Cir. 2005).

4. The Settlement Agreement defines the Settlement Class as

All persons with addresses in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, who were sent an initial collection letter from NSA in which the statutory 1692g validation notice was printed on the reverse of the letter, in uppercase and lowercase type, among paragraphs which were not indented or spaced, and placed along other copy that was capitalized, and the phrase "NOTICE-SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR IMPORTANT INFORMATION" in all capital letters was on the front of the letter where the underlying debt was incurred primarily for personal, family or household use, where the letter bears a date from October 12, 2012 to October 4, 2013.

5. Under the Settlement Agreement, each of the 222 Class members will receive a check for $100 from a $22, 200 settlement fund. Any remaining amount will be awarded cy pres to Clarifi, a nonprofit organization dedicated to financial literacy in the Delaware Valley.[1] Without reduction of the aforementioned settlement fund, as Class Representative, Denise Harlan will receive an additional $2, 000: $1, 000 as an individual settlement sum and $1, 000 as an incentive payment. North Shore has also agreed to revise the Subject Letter to make the disputed notice of validation rights more prominent.

6. Under the Settlement Agreement, North Shore agrees to pay Counsel, Cary L. Flitter, Theodore E. Lorenz, and Andrew M. Milz, of Flitter Lorenz, P.C., $44, 450 in attorneys' fees and costs. North Shore also agrees to pay the costs of notice to the Class and administration of the Settlement Amount. Again, such amount shall not reduce the settlement fund.

7. In exchange, Ms. Harlan and the Class will release North Shore from liability for

any and all claims, causes of action, suits, obligations, debts, demands, agreements, promises, liabilities, damages, losses, controversies, costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees of any nature whatsoever, whether based on any federal law (including the FDCPA), state law, common law, or any other type or form (whether in contract, tort, or otherwise, including statutory, common law, property, and equitable claims), which Plaintiff or any Pennsylvania Class Member has arising out of the Subject Letter, including, but not limited to... [c]laims arising out of the content of the Subject Letter.

8. For the reasons described in the Memorandum accompanying this Order, the Court preliminarily certifies the Settlement Class as satisfying the prerequisites of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, and, in particular, Rule 23(b)(3).

9. Denise Harlan is preliminarily appointed Class Representative and the law firm of Flitter Lorenz, P.C., is preliminarily appointed Class Counsel. 10. For the reasons described in the Memorandum accompanying this Order, the Court preliminarily approves the Settlement Agreement as fair, reasonable, and adequate, and in the best interest of the Class. 11. The Court hereby approves the proposed notice plan, attached to Ms. Harlan's September 4, 2014 Status Report (Docket No. 27), with the following instructions. Because North Shore will mail "individual notice to all members who can be identified through reasonable effort, " the Court finds that, in this case, first class ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.