Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Marshall v. Sobina

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

September 9, 2014

JAMES MARSHALL, Plaintiff,
v.
RAYMOND J. SOBINA et al., Defendant.

MEMORANDUM ORDER

MAURICE B. COHILL, Jr., Senior District Judge.

On June 16, 2014, Plaintiff James Marshall filed a "Motion for Injunctive Relief" [ECF # 136]. On July 7, 2014, Magistrate Judge Baxter issued a Report and Recommendation in which she recommended that Plaintiffs Motion for injunctive relief by denied [ECF #142].

Rule 72(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides: "The district judge must determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge's disposition that has been properly objected to. The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions." Id.

Objections to the Report and Recommendation were due by July 24, 2014. To date, no Objections have been filed.

After de novo review of Plaintiffs Motion for Injunctive Relief and the other documents in this case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 9th day of September, 2014, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [ECF #142], dated July 7, 2014, is adopted as the Opinion of the Court.

It is further hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the Plaintiffs Motion for Injunctive Relief [ECF#136] is DENIED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.