United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
EDWARD G. SMITH, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 5th day of September, 2014, after considering the motion of the defendant, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, to dismiss counts I & II of the amended complaint (Doc. No. 5), and the reply to the motion to dismiss filed by the plaintiff, Craig Van Arsdel (Doc. No. 6); and after reviewing the amended complaint and the exhibit attached thereto (Doc. No. 3), it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. The motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 5) is DENIED without prejudice to being reasserted in a motion for summary judgment;
2. The defendant shall have a period of fourteen (14) days to file an answer to the amended complaint;
3. The parties shall have a period of sixty (60) days from the date of this order to conduct discovery whether ERISA preempts the state law claims asserted by the plaintiff in this case or whether the Safe Harbor provision, 29 C.F.R. § 2510.3-1(j), applies to the policy at issue;
4. At the conclusion of the aforementioned discovery period, the parties may file motions for summary judgment addressing the applicability of the Safe Harbor provision. The parties shall file ...