Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Mebane v. Walsh

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

May 28, 2014

RAYMOND J. MEBANE, Petitioner,
v.
JEROME W. WALSH, et al., Respondents.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER [1]

CYNTHIA REED EDDY, District Judge.

Petitioner, state prisoner Raymond J. Mebane, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, as amended by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 ("AEDPA"). He is challenging the judgment of sentence imposed upon him by the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County on September 30, 2010.

On July 1, 2010, Petitioner entered a general plea to eight (8) counts of possession with intent to deliver controlled substance (Counts 1-8) and eight (8) counts of ungraded misdemeanors (Counts 9-16). On September 30, 2010, the trial court sentenced Petitioner to an aggregate term of 12-28 years' imprisonment. Petitioner did not file a direct appeal with the Superior Court. Accordingly, his judgment of sentence became final on November 1, 2010, [2] which was thirty days after the judgment of conviction was entered. Gonzalez v. Thaler, ___ U.S. ___, 132 S.Ct. 641, 653-56 (2012) (a judgment becomes final at the conclusion of direct review or the expiration of time for seeking such review). See also Swartz v. Meyers, 204 F.3d 417, 419 (3d Cir. 2000).

On October 20, 2011, Petitioner, through counsel, filed a timely Petition for Post Conviction Collateral Relief.[3] On December 30, 2011, after giving notice to Petitioner, the court dismissed the PCRA Petition. Petitioner filed an appeal, and on February 21, 2013, the Superior Court affirmed the dismissal of the PCRA Petition. On November 6, 2013, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court denied the Petition for Allowance of Appeal ("PAA").

On or about January 13, 2014, Petitioner filed with this Court his habeas petition (ECF No. 1).[4] Petitioner asserts that his sentence was illegal and that the court abused its discretion in fashioning its sentence, particularly in light of the fact that he has Crohn's Disease. Petitioner may also be contending that counsel was ineffective for failing to pursue this issue(s) post-sentence.

Discussion

AEDPA imposes a one-year limitations period for state prisoners seeking federal habeas review. It is codified at 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d) and it provides:

(1) A 1-year period of limitation shall apply to an application for a writ of habeas corpus by a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State Court. The limitation period shall run from the latest of-
(A) the date on which the judgment became final by the conclusion of direct review or the expiration of the time for seeking such review;
(B) the date on which the impediment to filing an application created by State action in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States is removed, if the applicant was prevented from filing by such State action;
(C) the date on which the constitutional right asserted was initially recognized by the Supreme Court, if the right has been newly recognized by the Supreme Court and made retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review; or
(D) the date on which the factual predicate of the claim or claims presented could have been discovered through the exercise of due diligence.
(2) The time during which a properly filed application for State post-conviction or other collateral review with respect to the pertinent judgment or claim is pending shall not be counted ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.