Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Beasley Forest Products, Inc. v. Universal Pipeline, LLC

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

May 1, 2014

BEASLEY FOREST PRODUCTS, INC, Plaintiff,
v.
UNIVERSAL PIPELINE, LLC, et al., Defendants.

ORDER

CATHY BISSOON, District Judge.

Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 17) against Defendant Universal Pipeline, LLC, [1] will be denied without prejudice to renewal as described below. Plaintiff's Motion claims to seek a "sum certain, " and it proposes that judgment be entered by the Clerk pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(1). See Mot. at ¶ 3; see also proposed order (Doc. 19) (containing signature line for Clerk of Court). Plaintiff's request for an award of attorneys' fees ( see Mot. at ¶ 6), however, places the request outside the scope of subsection (b)(1). See Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Vika, 2013 WL 2155180, *1 (M.D. Pa. May 17, 2013) ("A claim for attorney's fees will rarely be for a sum certain' because, typically, a judicial determination is necessary to decide whether to award fees, and, if an award will be made, in what amount.") (citation to quoted source omitted). Plaintiff may refile, and the renewed motion will be decided by the Court under Federal Rule 55(b)(2). Should Plaintiff wish to avoid a damages hearing, its counsel should include sufficient information regarding fees and costs ( e.g., billing statements or ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.