United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
MARK R. HORNAK, District Judge.
Plaintiffs complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on July 22, 2013, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.
The magistrate judge's report and recommendation, filed on March 14, 2014, recommended that Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No.9) be denied, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 11) be granted, and the decision of the ALJ be affirmed. Service was made on all parties by NEF. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the report and recommendation, the following order is entered:
AND NOW, this 25th Day of April, 2014;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No.9) is DENIED, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 11) is GRANTED, and the decision of the ALJ is affirmed
The report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, dated March 14, 2014, is adopted ...