Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Glover v. Udren

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

April 24, 2014

MARY E. GLOVER, Plaintiff,
v.
MARK J. UDREN, UDREN LAW OFFICES, P.c., WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, GOLDMAN SACHS MORTGAGE COMPANY Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DONETTA W. AMBROSE, District Judge.

On April 23, 2014, the magistrate judge entered an Order denying Plaintiffs motion to strike a declaration by Defendant Wells Fargo's Vice President of Loan Documentation, Keaton C. Stoneking. Memo. Order [ECF No. 690]. The motion was denied on the basis that it did not seek to exclude any redundant, immaterial, impertinent or scandalous matter under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f) and that the arguments raised therein were more appropriately considered evidentiary issues. Plaintiff filed objections arguing that a motion to strike a Rule 56 affidavit and/or declaration was the proper procedure for bringing her motion. Obj. [ECF No. 691]. I find that the magistrate judge's order is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law.[1]

Additionally, I find that the declaration is properly considered in determining Defendant's motion for summary judgment. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c)(4) states that "[a]n affidavit or declaration used to support or oppose a motion must be made on personal knowledge, set out facts that would be admissible in evidence, and show that the affiant or declarant is competent to testify on the matters stated." Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c)(4).

Stoneking's declaration is supported by and cites to record evidence of Plaintiffs note, mortgage, servicing agreements, loan payment history, loan modification agreement, escrow account history, and escrow disclosure statements that are all attached to the declaration, and have previously been submitted as evidence of record. Additionally, Stoneking declares that he is

Vice President of Loan Documentation for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., successor by merger to Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. The information contained in this declaration is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, and if called to testify regarding the matters addressed herein, I could and would competently do so based both on my personal knowledge and based upon my review of the business records of Wells Fargo Home Mortgage[, ]... including Plaintiff Mary Glover's loan file.... In my capacity as Vice President of Loan Documentation, I have come to know policies, practices, and procedures of Wells Fargo concerning its role as a servicer of residential mortgage loans, and am familiar with the policies and procedures regarding the servicing of residential mortgage loans. In addition, I have reviewed and I am familiar with Plaintiff Mary Glover's loan file.

Declaration of Keaton C. Stoneking ΒΆΒΆ 1-2. Therefore, he has personal knowledge of the facts he declares, and is competent under Rule 56(c)(4) and his declaration may be properly considered in determining Defendant's motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, Plaintiffs objections are overruled.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 24th day of April, 2014, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's objections [ECF No. 691] are OVERRULED as neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.