Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Navedo v. Primecare Medical, Inc.

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

April 14, 2014

CARLA NAVEDO, special representative of the estate of ANNA MARIE MURILLO, Plaintiff,
v.
PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC., et al., Defendants.

ORDER

YVETTE KANE, District Judge.

AND NOW, on this 14th day of April 2014, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendant's omnibus motion in limine (Doc. No. 49) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows:

1. Defendant's motion in limine to preclude Plaintiff from introducing evidence to support a lost earning capacity claim is DENIED AS MOOT;
2. Defendant's motion in limine to preclude Plaintiff from introducing evidence critical of Decedent's care at York Hospital during and after May 15, 2010 is DENIED AS MOOT;
3. Defendant's motion in limine to preclude Plaintiff from introducing expert evidence from co-Defendants regarding standard of care and causation is DENIED AS MOOT;
4. Defendant's motion in limine to preclude Plaintiff from introducing the videotaped statement of Decedent is GRANTED insofar as Plaintiff may not introduce the videotaped statements or a transcript of same. However, Plaintiff is not precluded from introducing the photographic images of Decedent contained in the video.

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.