Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Crockett v. Miller

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

February 14, 2014

IVAN M. CROCKETT, Plaintiff,
v.
ROBERT MILLER, Defendant.

MEMORANDUM ORDER

KIM R. GIBSON, District Judge.

This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b), and Local Rule 72 for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on January 29, 2014, docket no. 111, recommending that defendant's motion for summary judgment, docket no. 80, be granted and plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, docket no. 86, be denied.

The parties were notified that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 636 (b) (1), they had fourteen days to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff filed timely objections at docket no. 112, that I have reviewed.

After de novo review of the record, the Report and Recommendation, and the timely objections thereto, the following judgment order is entered:

JUDGMENT (see Fed.R.Civ.P. 58 (b) (1) (C))

AND NOW, this 14th day of February, 2014, it is

ORDERED that summary judgment is ordered in favor of the defendant. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk shall mark this matter closed.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.