WILLIAM G. WARD, et al.
v.
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, Inc.
ORDER
L. FELIPE RESTREPO, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 2nd day of January, 2014, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, or in the alternative, for Summary Judgment (Doc. 13), Plaintiffs' Response (Doc. 15), and Defendant's Reply (Doc. 18), for reasons explained in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:
1. JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc., and against Plaintiffs William G. Ward, James McQuade, ...