Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

[U] In re K.S.J.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

December 3, 2013

IN RE: K.S.J., APPEAL OF: C.J., MOTHER IN RE: S.R.J., APPEAL OF: C.J., MOTHER IN RE: D.I.J., MINOR CHILD APPEAL OF: C.J., MOTHER IN RE: C.M.M.J., APPEAL OF: C.J., MOTHER

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION

Appeal from the Order Entered May 10, 2013 In the Court of Common Pleas of Wayne County Domestic Relations at No(s): 4-2012-AD, 5-2012-AD, 6-2012-AD, 8-2012-AD

BEFORE: GANTMAN, J., DONOHUE, J., AND OLSON, J.

MEMORANDUM

GANTMAN, J.

Appellant, C.J. ("Mother"), appeals from the order entered in the Wayne County Court of Common Pleas, which involuntarily terminated Mother's parental rights to her four minor children, K.S.J., S.R.J., D.I.J., and C.M.M.J. ("Children").[1] We affirm.

In it opinions, the trial court fully and correctly set forth the relevant facts of this case. Therefore, we have no reason to restate them.

Procedurally, on August 27, 2012, Wayne County Children and Youth Services ("CYS") filed petitions for involuntary termination of Mother and Father's parental rights as to four of their minor children. The court held hearings on the petitions on March 5, 2013 and March 19, 2013. On May 10, 2013, the court entered an order involuntarily terminating Mother and Father's parental rights to K.S.J., S.R.J., D.I.J., and C.M.M.J. On June 4, 2013, Mother timely filed a notice of appeal, along with a concise statement of errors complained of on appeal pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 1925(a)(2)(i).

Mother raises four issues for our review:
WHETHER THE COURT ERRED IN FINDING THAT CYS PROVED THE ELEMENTS OF TERMINATION WITH RESPECT TO 23 PA.C.S.A. § 2511(A)(1).
WHETHER THE COURT ERRED IN FINDING THAT MOTHER FAILED TO PERFORM HER PARENTAL DUTIES PURSUANT TO 23 PA.C.S.A. § 2511(A)(5).[2]
WHETHER THE COURT ERRED IN FINDING THAT
TERMINATION WOULD BEST SERVE THE NEEDS AND WELFARE OF THE CHILDREN PURSUANT TO 23 PA.C.S.A. § 2511(A)(8).
WHETHER THE COURT ERRED IN FINDING THAT
TERMINATION WOULD BEST SERVE THE NEEDS AND WELFARE OF THE CHILDREN PURSUANT TO 23 ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.