Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

I.C. v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation

United States District Court, Third Circuit

August 7, 2013

I.C., a Minor, by MARIA PINO and THOMAS CINTAO, Guardians, and MARIA PINO and THOMAS CINT AO, Individually Plaintiffs,
v.
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION d/b/a GLAXOSMITHKLINE, Defendant

MEMORANDUM

RONALD BUCKWALTER, Senior Judge.

Before the court is Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand. As Plaintiffs' counsel has pointed out, there are nine cases having "the same exact remand issue." They are:

1. Kenney v. GSK, Civil Action No. 13-3675 (Judge Mitchell S. Goldberg)
2. Moore v. GSK, Civil Action No. 13-3676 (Judge Mitchell S. Goldberg)
3. Cammarota v. GSK, Civil Action No. 13-3677 (Judge John R. Padova)
4. Cintao v. GSK, Civil Action No. 13-3681 (Judge Ronald L. Buckwalter)
5. Staley v. GSK, Civil Action No. 13-3684 (Judge Mary A. McLaughlin)
6. Powell v. GSK, Civil Action No. 13-3693 (Judge Michael M. Baylson)
7. Rader v. GSK, Civil Action No. 13-3694 (Judge C. Darnell Jones II)
8. Nieman v. GSK, Civil Action No. 13-3695 (Judge Ronald L. Buckwalter)
9. Guddeck v. GSK, Civil Action No. 13-3696 (Judge Harvey Bartle III)

Recently, two judges of this court (Bartle and McLaughlin) have denied Plaintiffs' Motion by opinions and orders dated July 24, 2013 and July 26, 2013. Having reviewed those opinions as well as the briefs filed in this case, I too will deny the Motion to Remand.

AND NOW, this 7th day of August, 2013, upon consideration of Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand and Defendant's Response thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that said Motion (Docket No. 4) is DENIED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.