JAN E. DuBOIS, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 24th day of May, 2013, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Document No. 10, filed January 15, 2013), Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Document No. 11, filed January 23, 2013), and Defendant's Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Document No. 14, filed February 1, 2013), for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum dated May 24, 2013, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows:
1. That part of defendant's Motion which seeks a dismissal of plaintiff's claims of interference under the FMLA for (1) failing to properly designate time off from work by plaintiff as FMLA time, and (2) failing to provide plaintiff with individualized notifications of his rights, obligations and entitlements under the FMLA, under the Second Cause of Action of the Amended Complaint, is GRANTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to plaintiff's right to file a second amended complaint consistent with the Memorandum dated May 24, 2013, within twenty (20) days if warranted by the facts.
2. Defendant's Motion is DENIED in all other respects.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a preliminary pretrial conference will be ...