MEMORANDUM RE: PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR REMAND
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Michael Grice, seeks judicial review of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration's denial of his application for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income. Grice contends that the Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") erred in concluding he has the residual functioning capacity ("RFC") to perform light work. Specifically, Grice argues that the ALJ erred in (1) failing to credit his treating physician's opinion that he has manipulative limitations, and (2) relying on the Medical-Vocational Guidelines despite the ALJ's finding that Grice suffers from both exertional and nonexertional limitations. As discussed below, it is premature to rule on either of these issues because the ALJ does not appear to have considered the illegible treatment notes of Grice's treating physician. Accordingly, the Court will GRANT Plaintiff's motion to remand with an instruction that the ALJ obtain a legible copy of the treatment notes so that the ALJ's RFC determination can properly take into account all relevant medical evidence.
II. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
A detailed recounting of the medical evidence in this case is not necessary for purposes of this opinion. The relevant facts are as follows:
Grice is a 41-year-old male suffering from a degenerative disease of his cervical spine that has been variously diagnosed as cervical disc disease, spondylitis, myelomacia, and cervical myelopathy. Grice claims he suffers various debilitating symptoms from this condition, including severe neck pain, limited flexibility, bilateral arm paresthesias, and weakness in both upper extremities.
On July 2, 2009, several weeks before filing for disability benefits, Grice received an MRI examination by Mark J. Kotapka, M.D. This examination, which revealed "marked stenosis" in Grice's cervical spine, prompted Kotapka to recommend anterior cervical fusion surgery at the C3-7 levels. Grice received an additional MRI on September 9, 2009 from John Handal, M.D. As with Kotapka, Handal concluded that the narrowing of Grice's spinal cord space required surgical intervention. On September 16, 2009, Grice underwent cervical fusion surgery.
In 2010, medical assessments of Grice's RFC produced contradictory conclusions. One of the RFC assessments was conducted on February 18, 2010 by Elizabeth Kamenar, M.D., a state medical consultant. Kamenar, who had never examined Grice, relied on the notes of Grice's consultative examination with Harvey Azarva, M.D., on January 27, 2010. The other assessment was conducted on June 10, 2010 by Grice's treating physician, Lance Yarus, D.O. Yarus first examined Grice on February 16, 2010, and had subsequent office visits with Grice on April 19, May 24, July 15, and August 19.
While Kamenar and Yarus both found Grice to have nonexertional limitations,  they disagreed on the nature and extent of these limitations. Both doctors found Grice to have postural limitations,  but only Yarus found Grice to have manipulative limitations. The two doctors also reached different conclusions with respect to Grice's exertional limitations. Kamenar stated, for example, that Grice could "frequently" lift 10 pounds and stand/walk 6 hours in an 8-hour day. Yarus, by contrast, stated that Grice could "rarely" lift 10 pounds and could only stand/walk 1 hour in an 8-hour day.
At Grice's hearing on October 1, 2010, the ALJ stated that Yarus's treatment notes were illegible. Yarus had provided contemporary treatment notes for each of the four appointments that Grice had with him between April 2010 and August 2010. The ALJ stated "I can't make out Dr. Yarus's handwriting, that's the problem, " before noting "I'd like to see that [Yarus's RFC assessment] is supported by the contemporary office visits." A.R. at 35.
On November 18, 2010, the ALJ issued a written opinion that rejected Grice's disability claim on the basis that his exertional and nonexertional limitations do not prevent him from performing a range of light work as defined in the Medical Vocational Guidelines. In reaching this conclusion, the ALJ placed "great weight" on Kamenar's RFC assessment and little weight on Yarus's. In explaining why she gave little weight to Yarus's opinion, the ALJ expressed incredulity at Yarus's assertion that Grice cannot sit, stand, and walk for more than three hours a day and that Grice needs to take a 15-minute break every 15 minutes. "There is nothing in Dr. Yarus's treatment notes, " the ALJ wrote, "that supports such an exaggerated assessment." A.R. at 28.
On April 16, 2012, the Appeals Council denied Plaintiff's request to review the ALJ's decision, thereby making the ALJ's ruling the Agency's final decision. On June 22, 2012, Plaintiff sought judicial review with this Court, (ECF No. 2), and, on October 3, 2012, moved for summary judgment or, in the alternative, remand (ECF No. 9).
Upon reviewing the Administrative Record and noticing apparently contradictory statements by the ALJ with respect to Dr. Yarus's treatment notes, the Court requested briefing from the parties on whether the case should be remanded "on the grounds that the current record does not allow for a reasoned review of the ALJ's dismissal of Dr. Yarus's assessment of Plaintiff's postural and manipulative ...