Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Braho v. Commonwealth

United States District Court, Third Circuit

May 8, 2013

DAVID BRAHO, Pro Se Petitioner,
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent.

MEMORANDUM ORDER

CATHY BISSOON, District Judge.

This case was referred to United States Chief Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. ยงยง 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and Rules 72.C and 72.D of the Local Rules for Magistrates. On April 3, 2013, the chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 7), recommending that Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 4) be summarily dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and that a certificate of appealability be denied.[1] Service of the Report and Recommendation was made on Petitioner with objections due April 22, 2013. No objections have been filed.

After a de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following Order is entered:

AND NOW, this 8th day of May, 2013,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of April 3, 2013 (Doc. 7) is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 4) is summarily DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction and that a certificate of appealability is DENIED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.