Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

The Estate of Eleanor Hodges v. Green Meadows and

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


March 29, 2013

THE ESTATE OF ELEANOR HODGES, SUSAN M. SCHOCH, EXECUTRIX, PLAINTIFF
v.
GREEN MEADOWS AND EMERITUS ASSISTED LIVING, DEFENDANTS

The opinion of the court was delivered by: James Knoll Gardner United States District Judge

ORDER

NOW, this 29th day of March, 2013, upon consideration of the following documents:

(1) Defendant's Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss Counts II, III, and IV of the Complaint, which motion was filed on April 10, 2012, together with

(A) Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed.R.C.P. 12(b)(6);

(B) Agreement to Resolve Disputes by Binding Arbitration, dated March 25, 2010, Exhibit A to defendants' motion to compel and memorandum; and

(C) Complaint filed March 15, 2012 in the Court of Common Pleas of Lehigh County, Pennsylvania in case number 2011-C-1831, Exhibit B to defendants' motion to compel and memorandum;

(2) Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' 12(b)(6) Motion to Compel Arbitration, which opposition was filed on August 10, 2012, together with

(A) Plaintiff's Brief in Support of Opposition to Defendants' 12(b)(6) Motion to Compel Arbitration; and

(B) Exhibits to plaintiff's brief:

Exhibit 1: Complaint filed March 15, 2012

Exhibit 2: Affidavit of Susan M.

Schoch, Executrix

Exhibit 3: Arbitration Agreement; Exhibit 4: AAA Consumer Arbitration

Procedures

Exhibit 5: arbitration panel biographies Exhibit 6: Article on The Costs of Arbitration, Public

Citizens Congress Watch, April 2002 Exhibit 7: Interim Account of the Estate of Eleanor J.

Hodges, Deceased Exhibit 8: proposed Order denying motion to compel arbitration Exhibit 9: Certificate of Service of plaintiff's opposition and plaintiff's brief;

(3) Reply Brief in Support of Defendant's 12(b)(6) Motion to Compel Arbitration, which reply brief was filed on September 5, 2012, together with

(A) Exhibits to defendants' reply brief:

Exhibit A: June 20, 2012 Order approving joint motion Exhibit B: Plaintiff's July 30, 2012 deposition transcript Exhibit C: Arbitration Agreement Exhibit D: Fee and Representation Agreement; and

(4) Notice of Removal filed April 4, 2012, together with

(A) Exhibits to Notice of Removal:

Exhibit A: Praecipe for Summons and Writ of Summons filed

May 12, 2012 Exhibit B: Complaint filed March 15, 2012

Exhibit C: Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal dated April 4, 2012 Exhibit D: Civil Cover Sheet and Case Designation Sheet; and for the reasons expressed in the accompanying Opinion,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss Counts II, III, and IV of the Complaint is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed without prejudice to raise in arbitration the issues contained in the dismissed Complaint.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are directed to submit this dispute to arbitration, as provided by the Agreement to Resolve Disputes by Binding Arbitration, attached to defendant's motion to compel and memorandum as Exhibit A.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this case closed for statistical purposes.

BY THE COURT:

James Knoll Gardner

20130329

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.