Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Barbara Robertshaw v. Gary Pudles

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


March 20, 2013

BARBARA ROBERTSHAW
v.
GARY PUDLES, ET AL.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Thomas N. O'neill, Jr., J.

ORDER

AND NOW this 20th day of March, 2013, it is ORDERED that Pudles's motion to dismiss the amended complaint (Dkt. No. 95) is DENIED.

It is further ORDERED that Answernet's motion to dismiss the amended complaint (Dkt. No. 94) is DENIED.

It is further ORDERED that Babjak's motion to dismiss the amended complaint (Dkt. No. 104) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: Robertshaw's negligence claim against Babjak is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; Bajak's motion is DENIED as to the fraud and breach of fiduciary duty claims against her.

On or before March 27, 2013 counsel and Mr. Pudles should notify the Court by letter the estimated length of the trial of this case and their trial attachments, if any, for the next three months. The Court will attempt to set a trial date for this matter as soon as practicable.

If the parties believe a settlement conference would be productive they should contact my deputy Mr. Charles Ervin (267-299-7559) promptly.

Thomas N. O'Neill

20130320

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.