IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
March 14, 2013
D.M. (MOTHER) AND D.M. (FATHER), INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF J.M. AND D.P., PLAINTIFFS,
COUNTY OF BERKS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Michael M. Baylson, U.S.D.J.
ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT
And NOW, this 14th day of March 2013, for the reasons stated in the foregoing memorandum, it is ORDERED that Defendants' Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint (ECF No. 8) is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiffs' claim of illegal entry against Defendants Grimes, McCollum, and High, but DENIED as to all other claims. It is further ORDERED that Defendants' Rule 12(e) Motion for a More Definite Statement (ECF No. 8) is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
Michael M. Baylson
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.