Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Zachary Hiscock v. City of Philadelphia

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


February 25, 2013

ZACHARY HISCOCK
v.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ET AL.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: William H. Yohn Jr., Judge

ORDER

AND NOW, this 25th day of February 2013, after careful consideration of plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint (Doc. No. 6), defendant's response, and plaintiff's reply, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint is DENIED.

The court having directed the plaintiff to name the John Doe defendant within sixty days of the Scheduling Order dated June 18, 2012, and the plaintiff not having done so, it is further ORDERED that defendant John Doe is DISMISSED as a party to this action.

Summary judgment having been granted to the City of Philadelphia on January 16, 2013, based on the plaintiff's failure to oppose the City's motion for summary judgment; the lack of any evidence of a custom or policy; and state-granted immunity, the clerk is directed to mark this action CLOSED for statistical purposes.

William H. Yohn Jr.

20130225

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.