IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
January 31, 2013
VICTOR AMRAMSKY AND ALLA ABRAMSKY
INGA ZMIRLI AND VOLODYMYR LISOVYY
The opinion of the court was delivered by: John R. Padova, J.
AND NOW, this 31st day of January, 2013, upon consideration of "Golden Age Home Care Inc.'s Joint Motion to Intervene" (Docket No. 7), and all documents filed in connection therewith, and in for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that theMotion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows:
1. Golden Age Home Care, Inc.'s ("Golden Age") Motion to Intervene is DISMISSED insofar as it seeks intervention pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24.
2. The Motion to Intervene is GRANTED insofar as it seeks joinder of Golden Age as a Defendant in this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19.
Golden Age shall
retain its own counsel.
4. Plaintiffs shall file an Amended Complaint adding Golden Age as a Defendant to this action within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order.
BY THE COURT:
John R. Padova
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.