IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
January 30, 2013
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lawrence F. Stengel, J.
AND NOW, this 30th day of January, 2013, upon consideration of the Defendant Habeas Corpus Motion Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and all other responses and replies thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Defendant Calcagni's Habeas Corpus Motion Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. No. 182) and Defendant's Supplemental Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (Doc. No. 199) is DENIED; and
2. Because the defendant has failed to make a substantial showing of a denial of any constitutional right, a certificate of appealability is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.