IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
January 24, 2013
ERIC MANLEY, ET AL.
NAVMAR APPLIED SCIENCES CORP., ET AL.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Juan R. Sanchez, J.
AND NOW, this 24th day of January, 2013, it is ORDERED as follows:
Plaintiff Eric Manley's Motion to Amend/Correct (Document 17) is DENIED as moot;
Defendants Butch Barr, Andrew McWatt, Richard Salinger, Mike Kelley, John Matos, Bradley Thompson, and Richard Miller's Motions to Dismiss (Documents 19, 20, 21, 29, 30, 31, and 32) are GRANTED;
Defendants Thomas Fenerty and Navmar Applied Sciences Corporation's Motion to Dismiss (Document 22) is GRANTED;
Plaintiffs' Motions to Dismiss (Documents 25 and 35) are construed as replies to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss and are DENIED;
Plaintiffs' Amended Complaints (Documents 16, 17 and 18) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE against all Defendants;
Plaintiffs' Complaint and Request for Injunctive Relief (Document 37) is DENIED; and
The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mark this case CLOSED.
BY THE COURT:
Juan R. Sanchez
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.