Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
State of New Jersey v. Rpi Energy Mid-Atlantic Power Holdings
January 24, 2013
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
RPI ENERGY MID-ATLANTIC POWER HOLDINGS, LLC, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND STATE OF CONNECTICUT, INTERVENOR-PLAINTIFF,
v.
RRI ENERGY MID-ATLANTIC POWER HOLDINGS, LLC, ET AL., INTERVENOR-DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Henry S. Perkin United States Magistrate Judge
upon consideration of Defendant Metropolitan Edison Company's Amended Motion to Compel Production of Documents (Dkt. No. 270) filed on October 5, 2012, Plaintiff New Jersey's Letter Response (Dkt. No. 273) filed on October 22, 2012, Defendant Metropolitan Edison Company's Letter Reply (Dkt. No. 275) filed on November 1, 2012, Plaintiff New Jersey's Motion for Leave to File a Surreply Memorandum (Dkt. No. 297) filed on November 19, 2012, Defendant Metropolitan Edison Company's Letter Response to Plaintiff's Surreply Memorandum (Dkt. No. 301) filed on November 20, 2012, and for the reasoning set forth in the foregoing Memorandum; IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED in part*fn1 and DENIED in part.
AND NOW, this 24th day of January, 2013,