Amanda Howard v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lawrence F. Stengel, J.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 9th day of January 2013, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 25), Plaintiff's Response thereto (Doc. No. 27), Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 23), Defendants' Response thereto (Doc. No. 28), and Defendants' Supplement (Doc. No. 32), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED;

2. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as to Plaintiff's FMLA failure-to-reinstate claims against Defendants Lewandowski and Stoner, as well as to Plaintiff's ADA, RA, and PHRA failure-to-accommodate claims;

3. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to the remaining claims in the amended complaint;

4. The John Doe defendants are DISMISSED as parties to this action.

BY THE COURT:

Lawrence F. Stengel

20130109