Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Peer Bearing Company v. Roller Bearing Company of America

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


December 19, 2012

PEER BEARING COMPANY, PLAINITFF
v.
ROLLER BEARING COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC., DEFENDANT

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Michael M. Baylson, U.S.D.J.

ORDER

On August 24, 2012, Movants Pepper Hamilton LLP, Matthew D. Janssen, and David Richman filed a Motion to Quash subpoenas served on them by Respondent Roller Bearing Company of America, Inc. ("RBC") and requested sanctions against RBC (ECF 1). On September 24, 2012, Movants SKF USA, Inc. and Poul Jeppesen filed a Motion to Quash subpoenas served on them by RBC and requested sanctions against RBC (ECF 10). RBC filed responses to Movants Motions to Quash on September 10, 2012 (ECF 5) and October 11, 2012 (ECF 16) and requested that all Movants be compelled to comply with the subpoenas, as well as sanctions against all Movants. For the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. Movants Motions to Quash (ECF 1 and 10) are GRANTED in part, with respect to their requests that RBC's subpoenas be quashed, and DENIED in part, with respect to their requests for sanctions against RBC;

2. RBC's requests that all Movants be compelled to comply with the subpoenas and for sanctions against all Movants (ECF 5 and 16) are DENIED; and

3. The Clerk shall close this case.

BY THE COURT:

Michael M. Baylson

20121219

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.