IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
November 14, 2012
JOSEPH NISH, ET AL., DEFENDANTS
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Conner
AND NOW, this 14th day of November, 2012, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson (Doc. 64), recommending that plaintiff's motions for leave to file amended and supplemental complaints (Docs. 53 and 56) be denied, and, following an independent review of the record and noting that plaintiff filed objections*fn1 to the report on October 17, 2012 (Doc. 66), and the court finding Judge Carlson's analysis to be thorough and well-reasoned, and the court finding plaintiff's objections to be without merit and squarely addressed by Judge Carlson's Report (Doc. 64), it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Carlson (Doc. 64) are ADOPTED.
2. Plaintiff's motions for leave to file amended and supplemental complaints (Docs. 53 and 56) are DENIED.
3. The above-captioned case is REMANDED to Magistrate Judge Carlson for further proceedings.
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge