IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
November 2, 2012
DAVID FLEISHER, MICHAEL CLIME, GARY IPPOLITO, ROBERT L. LIVINGSTON, AND DAVID TAILLON, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED
FIBER COMPOSITES, LLC
The opinion of the court was delivered by: John R. Padova, J.
AND NOW, this 2nd day of November, 2012, upon consideration of Defendant Fiber Composites, LLC's ("Fiber") Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 15), and all documents filed in connection thereto, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows:
1. Fiber's Motion for Leave to File a Reply Memorandum (Docket No. 20) is GRANTED.
2. Fiber's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as to Claims I, III, VIII, and IX; and is DENIED as to Claims V, VI, and VII to the extent that the First Amended Complaint alleges a deceptive act based on failure to disclose a latent defect. 2. Fiber's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED as to Claims II and IV, and Claims II and IV are DISMISSED.
3. Plaintiffs' request for leave to amend the First Amended Complaint as to Claim II is GRANTED, and Plaintiffsshall file their amendment to the Complaint within 14 days of the date of this Order.
BY THE COURT:
John R. Padova
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.