Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Jane Doe v. Luzerne County

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


October 31, 2012

JANE DOE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
LUZERNE COUNTY, RYAN FOY, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, AND BARRY STANKUS, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: (judge Caputo)

ORDER

NOW, this 29th day of October, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

(1) Plaintiff's Motion in Limine Precluding Evidence of Arrest, Nolo Contendere Plea, or Any Related Testimony Since the Incident Occurred Four (4) Years After the Invasion of Privacy at Issue in this Case (Doc. 94) is GRANTED in part and DEFERRED in part. Evidence of Plaintiff's plea of nolo contendere to the July 2011 incident will be precluded; however, determination as to the admissibility of events and circumstances related to the criminal charges and arrest is DEFERRED to the time of trial.

(2) Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to Preclude Testimony about the Sexual Orientation of Plaintiff or Any Other Employee and Their Sexual History (Doc. 98) is DEFERRED to the time of trial.

(3) Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to Preclude Defendants' Expert's Notes (Doc. 106) is DENIED.

(4) Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to Preclude Representation of Witnesses (Doc. 108) is DEFERRED to the time of trial.

A. Richard Caputo United States District Judge

20121031

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.