Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Rebecca Stoneback v. Artsquest

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


October 17, 2012

REBECCA STONEBACK, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ARTSQUEST, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Michael M. Baylson, U.S.D.J.

ORDER

AND NOW , this 17 th day of October, 2012, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Jury Demand (ECF #3) is DENIED without prejudice;

2. Defendant's Motion for a More Definite Statement (ECF #4) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART ; and

3. Within fourteen (14) days, Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint containing a more definite statement of her claim that she was terminated in violation of the public policy of Pennsylvania.

BY THE COURT:

Michael M. Baylson

20121017

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.