IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
October 17, 2012
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Conner
Presently before the court is defendant Altimont Wilks's motion (Doc. 139) to correct the pre-sentence report wherein Wilksasks this court to alter his presentence report, and, thus, reduce his sentence based on, inter alia, disputed drug types and amountsand a firearm enhancement, (See Doc. 139, ¶ 2), and the court noting that this motion is in direct violation of this court's July 22, 2011 order in which the court acknowledged that it had already made a finding that Wilks was not entitled to a sentencing reduction, (see Docs. 132 & 138), and that Wilks was free to proceed pro se only insofar as he was not seeking to file additional motions requesting a sentence reduction, and therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion (Doc. 139) is DENIED.
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.