Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Rae Schiff v. Dennis J. Hurwitz

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


October 1, 2012

RAE SCHIFF, PLAINTIFF,
v.
DENNIS J. HURWITZ, M.D., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Arthur J. Schwab United States District Judge

ELECTRONICALLY FILED

Order on Motion to Compel

Upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Responses to Plaintiff's Requests for Admissions (doc. no. 91), and Defendant's Response thereto (doc. no. 92), said Motion is GRANTED.

Defendant, Dennis J. Hurwitz, M.D. shall, by October 8, 2012, amend his Answers to the following Requests for Admissions, specifying the basis for his denial or reason why he cannot unqualifiedly admit the Request: Request Numbers 6, 7, 9, 11, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 21, 40, 66, 67, 69, 70, 72, 75, 76, 78, 79, 81, 82 and 84.

Additionally, Defendant, Dennis J. Hurwitz, MD shall, by October 8, 2012, amend his Answers to the following Requests for Admissions where he has entered an improper objection by fully and completely responding to the Request: Request Numbers 3, 25 and 86.

Should Dr. Hurwitz fail to fully comply with the terms of this Order, Plaintiff shall file another Motion and the Court will take under advisement the Motion and whether the above Request for Admission(s) set forth in this Order shall be deemed admitted without qualification.

Arthur J. Schwab

cc: All Registered ECF Counsel and Parties

20121001

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.