IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
August 30, 2012
GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Harvey Bartle III J.
AND NOW, this 30th day of August, 2012, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:
(1) the motion of the defendant for summary judgment (Doc. #17) is GRANTED, declaring that on July 14, 2010, plaintiff Violet O'Neill was not a member of the household of her son, James O'Neill, and thus was not insured under GEICO policy #0305-47-54-02 for the purposes of underinsured motorists coverage; and
(2) the motion of the plaintiff for summary judgment (Doc. #18) is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.